| rafael nadal girlfriend :: rachel hunter supermodel |
| Author |
Message |
Byron
Guest
|
Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: queen latifah perfume |
|
|
I agree with most of what you say, just the times you mention. 'an hour', considering the state that most of my customers let their computer get to before they bring it in is certainly not sufficient. With digital picture & mp3 libraries these days the average is 40-60gb, if not 120, so the backup we do will take hours by themselves.. Lastly, an hour is often how long automatic scans take by themselves and automatic scanners don't remove the 0-day stuff. Presumably that's what I'm there for. I'm not ashamed to say I usually know nothing about the virus/spyware I'll be removing that day, which I think is fair since it's only been out for 2 days.
Dugg for the Monopoly Man's rippling pecs.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stringham
Guest
|
Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: pussycat dolls radio |
|
|
|
“If funny = Looking at it for six seconds and then closing the window and coming to read the comments, then yes. Yes indeed.I would say mildly and shortly entertaining?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Dezi
Guest
|
Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
DEY TUK R PLAYNZ!.
The poorer countries probably don't require several years of FDA-style drug testing.There is a commonly used drug in the US that's basically a cheap generic that has shown promise as a cancer treatment, even though it was originally designed to do something else entirely. But since the FDA requires testing to prove that the drug is effective as a treatment for whatever illess it's used for, nobody wants to do it. You're talking about hundreds of millions of dollars and several years of clinical studies to get approval to use a drug that's already on the market. And the reason they won't do it is because it can't be re-patented, so the company that spends all the money proving the drug works for cancer won't get to sell it exclusively, and then anyone else can just start selling their own versions without putting a dime into it.So a poor country can probably develop a drug much easier and much cheaper, but it won't have gone through anywhere near as much scrutiny to prove it's safe and effective.!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Winky
Guest
|
Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: pussycat dolls radio |
|
|
EarElephant, did you even read the article??
Good! Buried down to hell where it should be. Pedobear has a time and place but don't you dare touch Calvin & Hobbes! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Dhanelle
Guest
|
Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: youtube pussycat dolls |
|
|
:/ awkwaaard

|
|
| Back to top |
|
Hina
Guest
|
Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: pics of rafael nadal |
|
|
|
Why would we liberals want to destroy the GOP and the teabaggers (they're different?)? They are doing a perfectly good job themselves.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Tavlin
Guest
|
Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: rachel nichols gi joe |
|
|
|
Quite a leap you manage to make. Local Florida government equals health care.Sigh...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Edison
Guest
|
Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: pussycat dolls radio |
|
|
|
!
mrcameltoe
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Clae
Guest
|
Or like when a character's jaw drops and then they look like Sarah Jessica Parker. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|